Auteur: Schütrumpf, Eckart
Titre: Non-logical means of persuasion in Aristotle’s Rhetoric and Cicero’s De oratore
Revue/Collection: in: Fortenbaugh, W. W. & Mirhady, D. C. (Ed.), Peripatetic rhetoric after Aristotle, (Rutgers University studies in classical humanities, 6)
Lieu èdition: New Brunswick - London
Éditeur: Transaction
Annèe edition: 1994
Pages: 95-110
Mots-clès: Rhétorique - Retorica - Rhetorics, Sources - Fonti - Sources, Stylistique et genres littéraires - Stilistica e generi letterari - Stylistics and literary genre
Comptes rendus:
Oeuvres:
Sigle auteur: Schütrumpf 1994
Titre: Non-logical means of persuasion in Aristotle’s Rhetoric and Cicero’s De oratore
Revue/Collection: in: Fortenbaugh, W. W. & Mirhady, D. C. (Ed.), Peripatetic rhetoric after Aristotle, (Rutgers University studies in classical humanities, 6)
Lieu èdition: New Brunswick - London
Éditeur: Transaction
Annèe edition: 1994
Pages: 95-110
Mots-clès: Rhétorique - Retorica - Rhetorics, Sources - Fonti - Sources, Stylistique et genres littéraires - Stilistica e generi letterari - Stylistics and literary genre
Comptes rendus:
Sharples, R., "Phronesis", 39, 3, (1994), 341
Description: [APh] [Comment] Aristotle and Cicero have different conceptions of inventio and non-technical proofs. Cicero's account of emotional appeal is largely Platonic and not Aristotelian.Oeuvres:
Sigle auteur: Schütrumpf 1994
