Autore: McConnell, Sean
Titolo: The problem of Aristippus at Cicero, De officiis 1.148
Rivista/Miscellanea: Mnemosyne 76
Anno edizione: 2023
Pagine: 121–135
Parole chiave: Philologie - Filologia - Philology, Philosophie - Filosofia - Philosophy
Descrizione: The manuscripts of De officiis all record something strange at 1.148: Cicero says that the philosophers Socrates and Aristippus had exceptional licence to flout social custom and convention owing to their ‘great and divine good qualities’ (magna et divina bona). There are no worries about Socrates, but the example of Aristippus seems preposterous. This paper makes the following argument: (1) elsewhere Cicero defines divina bona in such a way to exclude hedonists; this should rule out crediting Aristippus with magna et divina bona alongside Socrates; (2) all scholarly efforts to account for the presence of Aristippus at 1.148 fail to convince; (3) the name Aristippus at 1.148 should, therefore, be remedied; (4) there are excellent philosophical reasons to think that Antisthenes, a follower of Socrates who is credited with setting in motion the Cynic philosophical tradition, is the name that Cicero wrote or should have written in the original [Author].
Opere:
Sigla autore: McConnell 2023a
Titolo: The problem of Aristippus at Cicero, De officiis 1.148
Rivista/Miscellanea: Mnemosyne 76
Anno edizione: 2023
Pagine: 121–135
Parole chiave: Philologie - Filologia - Philology, Philosophie - Filosofia - Philosophy
Descrizione: The manuscripts of De officiis all record something strange at 1.148: Cicero says that the philosophers Socrates and Aristippus had exceptional licence to flout social custom and convention owing to their ‘great and divine good qualities’ (magna et divina bona). There are no worries about Socrates, but the example of Aristippus seems preposterous. This paper makes the following argument: (1) elsewhere Cicero defines divina bona in such a way to exclude hedonists; this should rule out crediting Aristippus with magna et divina bona alongside Socrates; (2) all scholarly efforts to account for the presence of Aristippus at 1.148 fail to convince; (3) the name Aristippus at 1.148 should, therefore, be remedied; (4) there are excellent philosophical reasons to think that Antisthenes, a follower of Socrates who is credited with setting in motion the Cynic philosophical tradition, is the name that Cicero wrote or should have written in the original [Author].
Opere:
Sigla autore: McConnell 2023a
